When discussing the risks involved in the foot mats of the transformer station, the project manager could not ask only how many tons the pavement could bear. The extension of the transformer plant, the transport of transformers and the overhauling of equipment, are concerned about the different effects of the tyre landing, axle-load, turn, brake and static bearing in the “What risks are attached to the foot mats of the transformer station”, and the secondary crushing and restoration costs are often increased in the most unfavourable positions as a result of the fallout sequence. Reasonable coverage can be determined only if the routes, terminals and emergency exits must be secured.
The input information can be organized according to the four columns of equipment, ground, route and time, with emphasis on transformer transport axes, equipment weight, crane reversibility, rock and mosaic boundary, location of cables, safety distance and time for repairs. In response to the increase in secondary crushing and restoration costs as a result of an error in the sequence of the evacuation sites, it is recommended that the emergency route be reversed in the order in which the equipment was withdrawn and retained until the end. In the case of leg pads, the maximum repulsive force of the leg provided by the plant must be obtained, and in the case of passage roads, the total weight of the vehicle, the axle, the tyre and the complete turn track should be used. The information review should also adjust the intervals of inspections to take into account traffic, weather and abnormal frequency dynamics and include missing information as an item for confirmation of quotations and construction proposals.
Figure: Extension of transformer plant, transformer transport and equipment overhaul, this theme concerns the “Risk of sub-legging of transformer station”
The drainage direction, soft spots and support under the plate should be compared before and after the rainfall, and the water should not be enclosed under the plate. Temporary roads and hanger platforms within power transformers are subject to electrical safety, fire traffic and equipment transport programmes and cannot be placed on a temporary basis only on the available area. If a secondary crushing and restoration cost increase has already occurred as a result of an error in the ceremonial sequence of the evacuation site, the area should be sealed, the lifting plate should be connected to the drainage floor and then the repositioning; only the cleaning of the surface or the addition of an additional sheet cannot normally eliminate the cause. The trial-paint record of the “risks of the sub-legging at the power station” should indicate the starting and ending position, vehicle condition and release conclusions to facilitate review as construction conditions change.
The inspection cycle can be shortened at an early stage of use and then stabilized before adjusting to vehicle cycles and weather. The maintenance staff focused on the protection of the cables, the slab transition, full foot contact, oil contamination, grounding facilities, safe perimeters and depositions, while observing the driver ' s compliance with speed limits and turnover requirements. Any unconfirmed sub-board support, edge instability or foot contact should first be disabled. In the context of the “risks on the substrates of the transformer station”, the inspection forms are to be presented in a separate series of errors leading to a change in secondary crushing and recovery costs, and to a reference to the inspector and the time of return.
The receiving and inspection information shall be maintained in the form of maps, product numbers, photographs of entry and exit sites, initial ground conditions, abnormal worksheets and demolition records. In the event of a ground or equipment dispute, the information can distinguish between the original soft spot, the use of a change and the removal site damage, and can also quantify the impact on the cost of the project of the secondary crushing and recovery costs caused by the error in the order of the evacuation site. This retrodiscussion should also answer whether the “risks of the sub-legging of the transformer plant” are improved by the reverse removal and retention of the emergency route in the order in which the equipment was withdrawn, so as to avoid a subjective description of the end of the item.
Progress pressure cannot reduce the security floor. In the event of secondary crushing and restoration costs being increased as a result of a chronology error in the evacuation site, the decision should be made to repair, reroute or replace the product after isolation and identification of the cause. Any measures should avoid introducing new risks of slide, overloading, tripping, electric area intrusion or human-car conflict.
Need for further evaluation of the actual project?
Applications, sizes, quantities, site photographs or drawings and delivery destinations are sent, on which we can identify more suitable products and processing programmes.
