Will the cable recovery route be opened immediately after the flood?

The immediate opening of the cable recovery route following the retreat of the floods will first be judged by the separation of vehicle traffic, stationing of equipment from the support of the crane. In the case of storm surges, typhoons or post-flood electrical circuits emergency recovery sites, the focus of this topic is on whether “post-flood cable recovery routes can be opened immediately” usually follows multiple stages of entry, construction, overhaul and evacuation, with variations in ground water content and traffic. The most easily overlooked aspect of this topic is the increase in secondary crushing and restoration costs caused by the error in the sequence of the evacuation yard. The problem of grass-roots and drainage may have expanded if only ad hoc slabs were added after a vehicle has been trapped.

The focus of the topic is not on the choice of the thickest or the most heavy products, but on the establishment of a match. Coverage, connection and back-up quantities are then determined by means of representative trial-pading sutures, grass-roots and vehicle operating space, based on disaster route, water depth, soft-point range, car recovery type, arrival sequence, emergency time frame, public isolation and standby identification control conditions. In the case of products requiring cross-project turnaround, the numbering, loss rate, cleaning time and volume of transport should also be included in the total cost. The information review should also confirm the operational equipment stoppage time, the location of feeder points and the area of separation of personnel, and include missing information as items to be identified for quotations and construction programmes.

Figure: Emergency recovery site for power lines following heavy rains, typhoons or floods, with a focus on “The immediate opening of cable-recovered routes in the aftermath of the floods” (material material for the Creative Plastics Executive Network)

A smooth transition should be put in place at the different ground crossings to avoid the sudden impact of vehicles on temporary circuits from hard roads. The internal and external wheels and brake positions of the most heavy vehicles will also be reviewed in accordance with the completion of the laying of sews, floors and vehicle operating spaces through representative trial workshops. The speed of repairs cannot be a substitute for ground-based and traffic safety judgements, and the most critical rescue and equipment routes should be restored before heavy vehicles are opened on a segment basis. Physical segregation and clear rules for release are required in the vicinity of public areas. The test-pail record of the “Whether the retrenchment of the cable is immediately open” should indicate the starting point, vehicle status and release conclusions to facilitate review as construction conditions change.

Water accumulations, pumping mud, edges, vehicle congestion, leg deposition, lighting, public isolation and connections should be checked before classes, after peak traffic and after rainfall. Each record shall contain the date, location, vehicle, weather, unusual photographs and processing results. In the case of repeated fallout sequence errors in the same area, resulting in higher secondary crushing and restoration costs, the site should be re-analysed, drainage, transport organization and specifications instead of replacing surface components. The inspection form, which revolves around “is it possible to immediately open the retreading of the cable after the flood”, is intended to cause a change in the secondary crushing and restoration costs due to the error in the order of the separate evacuation field and to indicate the time of the retort and the resumption of traffic.

For energy projects that continue to be built or duplicated, a baseline may be established for each square metre of construction hours, vehicle cycle, cleaning time, damage rate and restoration costs. This will make it easier to identify whether the next offer and inventory planning is no longer based on experience alone, and whether the secondary crushing and recovery cost increases that result from the ceremonial error of the evacuation site are repeated in a given season. The retrodiscussion of this question should also answer whether the “immediate opening of a cable recovery route after a flood” has been demonstrated through a representative trial shop to verify the improvement of panels, floors and vehicle operating spaces and to avoid the closure of the item by a subjective description.

This paper provides a selection and management approach and does not replace the equipment instructions, the suspension programme, ground-based evaluation or local regulations. Work involving lifting support, underground facilities, electrical areas, the edges of trenches and the entry of persons into dangerous areas shall be reviewed by persons with appropriate qualifications. The above parameters may be provided in the request for quotations to obtain recommendations for size, thickness, quantity, packaging and shipment.